<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Livability Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livabilitylaw.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livabilitylaw.com</link>
	<description>Innovative Counsel for Tomorrow, Today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Defense Authorization Act Makes the Mission Harder For Military But Not Impossible by Greg Burke, AIA, NCARB</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/4337/comment-page-1#comment-19706</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Burke, AIA, NCARB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livabilitylaw.com/?guid=0bb40d2952746b673d4fdd073e039dd3#comment-19706</guid>
		<description>First of all I believe it is totally necessary to design buildings, especially those used by the government, to be high-performing buildings.  It becomes more critical every day to conserve our resources.

That being said, designing and constructing the buildings should not cost a great deal more, if at all, to be energy efficient.  I believe Congress objected to the cost of putting the plaque on the building.  This does cost more.  In some cases three to five percent of the design and construction cost.  If I as the architect has to do the paperwork, I expect to be compensated.  So too for the contractor.  Then there is the cost of commissioning and doing more paperwork.  I believe these are the costs.  Are they offset by energy savings?  I hope so, but like developers think - these are upfront costs that I don&#039;t need to spend.

All who own, design and construct buildings should strive for energy efficiency.  With all of the LEED certified buildings in the country, the quoted savings in the article are minimal.  Silver certification gets us buildings no better than those design forty-fifty years ago.  Why would any owner pay USGBC the fees for the plaque to get a building that performs as good as forty-fifty year old buildings?

Energy efficiency should be the goal - do I need a plaque to prove it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all I believe it is totally necessary to design buildings, especially those used by the government, to be high-performing buildings.  It becomes more critical every day to conserve our resources.</p>
<p>That being said, designing and constructing the buildings should not cost a great deal more, if at all, to be energy efficient.  I believe Congress objected to the cost of putting the plaque on the building.  This does cost more.  In some cases three to five percent of the design and construction cost.  If I as the architect has to do the paperwork, I expect to be compensated.  So too for the contractor.  Then there is the cost of commissioning and doing more paperwork.  I believe these are the costs.  Are they offset by energy savings?  I hope so, but like developers think &#8211; these are upfront costs that I don&#8217;t need to spend.</p>
<p>All who own, design and construct buildings should strive for energy efficiency.  With all of the LEED certified buildings in the country, the quoted savings in the article are minimal.  Silver certification gets us buildings no better than those design forty-fifty years ago.  Why would any owner pay USGBC the fees for the plaque to get a building that performs as good as forty-fifty year old buildings?</p>
<p>Energy efficiency should be the goal &#8211; do I need a plaque to prove it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cincinnati Streetcar: Triumphing Over an Anti-Transit Governor by Dustin Jones</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/4234/comment-page-1#comment-19702</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetsblog.net/?p=17497#comment-19702</guid>
		<description>Done!  Thanks for bringing that to my attention.  Duly noted.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done!  Thanks for bringing that to my attention.  Duly noted.  <img src='http://livabilitylaw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Defense Authorization Act Makes the Mission Harder For Military But Not Impossible by Brandt Hardin</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/4337/comment-page-1#comment-19701</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandt Hardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livabilitylaw.com/?guid=0bb40d2952746b673d4fdd073e039dd3#comment-19701</guid>
		<description>The NDAA only goes to further stifle our Constitutional Rights without the approval of the Americans, just as the Patriot Act was adopted WITHOUT public approval or vote just weeks after the events of 9/11.  A mere 3 criminal charges of terrorism a year are attributed to this act, which is mainly used for no-knock raids leading to drug-related arrests without proper cause for search and seizure.  The laws are simply a means to spy on our own citizens and to detain and torture dissidents without trial or a right to council.  You can read much more about living in this Orwellian society of fear and see my visual response to these measures on my artist’s blog at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/09/living-in-society-of-fear-ten-years.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NDAA only goes to further stifle our Constitutional Rights without the approval of the Americans, just as the Patriot Act was adopted WITHOUT public approval or vote just weeks after the events of 9/11.  A mere 3 criminal charges of terrorism a year are attributed to this act, which is mainly used for no-knock raids leading to drug-related arrests without proper cause for search and seizure.  The laws are simply a means to spy on our own citizens and to detain and torture dissidents without trial or a right to council.  You can read much more about living in this Orwellian society of fear and see my visual response to these measures on my artist’s blog at <a href="http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/09/living-in-society-of-fear-ten-years.html" rel="nofollow">http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2011/09/living-in-society-of-fear-ten-years.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Cincinnati Streetcar: Triumphing Over an Anti-Transit Governor by 5chw4r7z</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/4234/comment-page-1#comment-19695</link>
		<dc:creator>5chw4r7z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetsblog.net/?p=17497#comment-19695</guid>
		<description>Not to take anything away from this story or Urbancincy but the photo is actually mine. Urbancincy gave me credit at the end of their story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to take anything away from this story or Urbancincy but the photo is actually mine. Urbancincy gave me credit at the end of their story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High Rise Buildings Are Sooooo Expensive by Living in a dense community can save YOU money - Urban, city, town planning, land use, zoning, transportation and transit, environmental issues, urban design, community development, subdivisions, revitalization - Page 15 - City-Data Forum</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/3024/comment-page-1#comment-19684</link>
		<dc:creator>Living in a dense community can save YOU money - Urban, city, town planning, land use, zoning, transportation and transit, environmental issues, urban design, community development, subdivisions, revitalization - Page 15 - City-Data Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 05:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetsblog.net/?p=16186#comment-19684</guid>
		<description>[...] build taller buildings with more units than it is for lower buildings for the same number of units. High Rise Buildings Are Sooooo Expensive  Not taken into account, if you build a complete walkable city (in some fictitious scenario like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] build taller buildings with more units than it is for lower buildings for the same number of units. High Rise Buildings Are Sooooo Expensive  Not taken into account, if you build a complete walkable city (in some fictitious scenario like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New mapping tools highlight CO2 emissions to affordability by CNT Press Mentions August 2011 : Center for Neighborhood Technology</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/1967/comment-page-1#comment-19641</link>
		<dc:creator>CNT Press Mentions August 2011 : Center for Neighborhood Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livabilitylaw.com/?p=1967#comment-19641</guid>
		<description>[...] Town Community East Village Association August 11, 2011 Time for a Change Fauquier August 10, 2011 New Mapping Tools Highlight CO2 Emissions to Affordability Livability Law August 9, 2011 Do New Fuel Efficiency Numbers Add Up? In These Times August 9, 2011 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Town Community East Village Association August 11, 2011 Time for a Change Fauquier August 10, 2011 New Mapping Tools Highlight CO2 Emissions to Affordability Livability Law August 9, 2011 Do New Fuel Efficiency Numbers Add Up? In These Times August 9, 2011 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Missing the real point: city (re)development isn’t about “gentrification” as much as it is about urbanism and urban design by Lotta</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/2237/comment-page-1#comment-19636</link>
		<dc:creator>Lotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://streetsblog.net/?p=15323#comment-19636</guid>
		<description>All of my quiestnos settled-thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of my quiestnos settled-thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biltmore Fashion Park Redevelopment by Suchmaschinen Optimierungen</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/713/comment-page-1#comment-6689</link>
		<dc:creator>Suchmaschinen Optimierungen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livabilitylaw.com/?p=713#comment-6689</guid>
		<description>It was interesting. You seem very knowledgeable in your field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was interesting. You seem very knowledgeable in your field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Churches, Temples and Mosques…Oh My! by Gratis Gewinnspiele</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/860/comment-page-1#comment-6681</link>
		<dc:creator>Gratis Gewinnspiele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livabilitylaw.com/?p=860#comment-6681</guid>
		<description>Primarily, the story is de facto the greatest on this noteworthy topic. I consent with your conclusions and will busily look along to your next updates. With your authorisation allow me to take your feed to be up to speed with future posts. Thanks a million and please go on with the excellenct job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primarily, the story is de facto the greatest on this noteworthy topic. I consent with your conclusions and will busily look along to your next updates. With your authorisation allow me to take your feed to be up to speed with future posts. Thanks a million and please go on with the excellenct job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wigwam Looks to the Future While Respecting its Past by Gratis Gewinnspiele</title>
		<link>http://livabilitylaw.com/archives/921/comment-page-1#comment-6680</link>
		<dc:creator>Gratis Gewinnspiele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livabilitylaw.com/?p=921#comment-6680</guid>
		<description>Just   like to say your article  is impressive .  The  lucidity  in your article  is  just striking  and I can assume  that you are an  adept  on this  field .  With  your  authorization  allow  me to  take your rss feed  to keep up to date  with future articles .  Thank you a million  and please keep up  the  phenomenal  work .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just   like to say your article  is impressive .  The  lucidity  in your article  is  just striking  and I can assume  that you are an  adept  on this  field .  With  your  authorization  allow  me to  take your rss feed  to keep up to date  with future articles .  Thank you a million  and please keep up  the  phenomenal  work .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

